October 18, 2019

The brief history of the Royal family:

By mygossipgirl

Sharing is caring!

The Royal Couple Prince William and Princess Kate Midleton visited Pakistan and won our hearts. I was curious enough to know why the dutch and duchess have this importance, and why they are the apple of eyes to everyone. I dive into the dense history of the royal ancestors and gathered up all the information. Maybe you’re curious more than me, So let the start of the royal family on these fair isles. Well, there were kings and mini

countries before that and druids before that, and Pangaea before that, but we have to start

somewhere and a millennia ago is plenty far — if that leaves out Ethelred the Unready, so it goes.

the royals.

Royal Starting from 1066:

William the Conqueror, conquered in the Norman Conquest — Norman here being code for *French*. 

Because it’s the olden days, people had lots of kids, but to keep things simple this family.

The tree is going to leave many of them on each branch because of not every child matters. 

So William had three kids we care about William II, Henry I and Adela

Upon William the Conqueror’s death, William II became king. 

William II didn’t marry, and on a brother, day out with Henry died in a Hunting Accident that gave Henry I the crown. 

Henry, I had at least 26 children of which only two were 100% legit. He declared his daughter would rule next (after his son died in a shipwreck) and swore his knights to honor Empress Matilda by crossing their hearts, hoping to die, stick a needle in their eye — *but* when Henry I died while Matilda was in France, many ignored this while her cousin Stephen raced to Westminster using faster army diplomacy to get coronated first. 

Empress Matilda did eventually return and start a decades-long civil war — that was pretty much a stalemate because turtling in the 1100s was an effective RTS tactic. While she did rule part of the island, as Matilda never had an official coronation, her monarchical status is disputed. Now, as Stephens children were either dead, disinterested or a nun — his crown went to his nephew, Henry II who had four sons Henry the Young, Richard the Lionheart, King John… and Geoff. (Guess who died before his turn?) Henry II saw the history thus far of conquering, assassination, (maybe) usurpation, attritional war — and decided to wait until after the death of the current king before sorting out the *next* King didn’t work. 

So Henry II changed the system and crowned Henry the Young co-king with him, invoking the rule of two one is none. Two is one. If it’s important, you need a backup. It was a good plan for stability, helped by the young King s popularity, but unfortunately apprentice rebelled against the master, rallying his brothers — which resulted in another civil war of disputed monarchs during which Henry the Young died of dysentery, Henry the Elder died of fever, and Richard I took the crown. After Richard came John and four eldest son successions in a row John to Henry III (insert Magna Carta here) to Edward I (Longshanks) to Edward II to Edward III. Actually Ed II was overthrown by Isabelle of France A.K.A the She-Wolf of France A.K.A. his wife. After deposing her husband, she acted as regent for their son. Every one of these arrows glosses over a bit of complexity. 

Edward III had five sons Edward the Black Prince, Lionel, John, Edmund, and Thomas, none of which would wear the crown. When Edward III died, his throne would have gone to The Black Prince, but he was dead at the time so the crown went to his boringly named son Richard, now the second. There’s a bunch of drama Lamma stuff around Richard the second which your English teacher might force you to read about — but spoiler alert, history sending is always the same bigger-army diplomacy, this time from Henry IV who gets the crown and Richard II gets starvation in captivity. 

Another Henry before we get to the War of the Roses :

A war that strikes terror (and boredom) in the minds of students of history the nation .over who have to deal with *this* family tree simplified to explain why everyone was angry, but the shortest version ever is Edward III s great, great, grandchildren duked it out, even though one of them was dead for part of the fight — but we can’t get into that now so Henry VI to Edward IV to Henry VI to Edward IV. The end. Edward IV, on his deathbed, left his crown to his son. But being twelve he needed protection, 

so Richard, his best-est uncle in the world, promised to take super-good care of him. Edward then promptly disappeared under suspicious circumstances that left Richard to become Richard the third. But he didn’t stay king for long because Edward III s great, great, great, great-grandson Henry VII — took the crown, put a ring on Elizabeth of York to lock down that royal legitimacy and then sired Henry VIII — splitter of churches, and ladies. 

Henry VIII thought it was high time to formalize the rules of inheritance, so he wrote them out in his will — basically saying oldest boys first, girls only if there aren’t any boys — and Parliament approved the rules, which should have made everything neat and tidy, but we’re about to enter the really messy time.

The bad times of Royals:

because Henry s son lived just long enough to screw it up — inheriting the throne at there was, of course, a scheming protectorate running things, yet he still declared at 15 that his father s rules were dumb and his sisters were dumb and that his first cousin once removed, Lady Jane Grey should be the next monarch instead. Then he died and Lady Jane Grey became queen at sweet sixteen, sort of — in a disputed The status way for nine days, until beheaded by Mary, the first really, truly officially nobody doubts it, Queen Mary didn’t have any kids and passed the crown to Elizabeth I who became the second queen in a row… to not have children. But, no problem because Lady Jane Grey

was next Right. The royal thing which for our purposes joins the English branch where Edward III s great-granddaughter married into it in the 1400s and then go James series, Mary Queen of Scotts. Bringing us back to the 1600s. 
Henry the VIII s sister importantly also married into this line of the family giving it English legitimacy points in the eyes of the English Parliament, which asked to borrow Scotland James had a son, Charles I, and you might think this unification of the monarchs means the very messy time is over. 

But no.  

Because of Cromwell. 

Royal Cromwell( the lord protector) :

Cromwell didn’t like kings and beheaded Charles I declaring no royals any longer, making himself The Lord Protector which was in no way like a king — even though he was in charge and it was a hereditary office passed to his son. But the Cromwells didn’t last – mainly because his son was a fancy country squire who didn’t follow rule 0 keep the army happy — giving Charles son, Charles II, the ability to reestablish the monarchy. Charles II had lots of children, all of which were illegitimate, leaving his brother, James 

II was next in line. But James II was *Catholic* and ever since Henry split the church, Catholics had terrible approval ratings. But conveniently, he had nice Protestant daughters, one married to a Dutch Prince who by the nature of these things was the grandson of Charles I. Bonus English legitimacy points, plus, who doesn’t like the Dutch? 

With James so unpopular and William and Mary so popular, the army and nobles pretty much invited the royal couple to invade and James II fled. William and Mary ruled as co-monarchs, but without children, the crown went to Queen Anne, who also didn’t produce any heirs, though not from lack of effort — she was pregnant *seventeen* times. Again, finding themselves with a no-royals-no-longer situation, Parliament decided it was really, truly seriously the time to sort out the rules of inheritance to avoid pretenders from every branch of this messy tree fighting over the crown. Parliament did a royal reboot to clear the cruft, defining Sophia of Hanover — the granddaughter of James dual numbers to be the new starting point for all claims to the crown. These rules finally stuck, thus ending the very messy time. George I, son of Sophia, was the first king under the new rules, then his son George II,to George III, and even though he lost America and his mind, never fear, the rules are here, so the crown continued to calmly descend the family tree, going to George IV, who didn’t have any surviving children, to William IV who had ten children all illegitimate.

The royal era of 1800: 

then passing through his dead younger brother to Queen Victoria who started her reign in 1837 and made it to just over the finishing line of the 20th century. Which is a doubly impressively long time given the state of medical technology then. After the end of her age, the crown went to her son Edward VII to George V to Edward VIII who *finally* breaks up this neat and tidy (and somewhat boring) line of succession by committing a scandal marrying a commoner. An American Commoner! An American Commoner divorcee twice over Actually, the divorces were a real problem and weren’t compatible with the Monarch role as Head of State *and also* the Church of England in the 1930s. Edward abdicated to his brother George VI — who was reluctant to take the crown and then had to oversee World War II and the subsequent breakup of the British Empire — which drained the reluctant King s health, who died at 56 leaving the crown to Elizabeth the Second.

The royal 1900-Present:

 in 1952 the age of 25. Seven years older than Victoria, her great-great-grandmother was on her coronation day, but in early September 2015, Elizabeth became the longest-reigning Queen is not just British history, but world history.

From Elizabeth II the crown continues on to Charles, the longest heir apparent in British history, to his son William, to his son George.

And that is a brief history of the royal family.

Also, read: https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/a20736482/british-royal-family-tree/